True to our promise, the suggestions I Say No! for the new DC. If there is a new DC, of \u200b\u200bcourse. Improve
dealing with authors. Carlos Pacheco Hire or Kubert and pass almost unnoticed is of infinite stupidity and total. Change on the fly the conditions of contracts Vertigo line and making escape to Garth Ennis and Warren Ellis to IDW is to let them look. It is true that DC has a good stable of cartoonists, with Amanda Conner and Frank Quitely which attract me most, not to mention Ivan Reis and Gary Frank. However, as quality writers only have to Johns and Morrison on alternate days and Straczinsky is thinking about his films in his comics.
Looking to the future. Stop writing stories that fix problems created by other stories. Do not be slaves to continuity. Knowing that continuity is a tool, not an end. In DC would have to make motivational posters with phrases like the above, to see if they get into your head.
Clean
dramatis personae. In DC there are too many sprinters, archers, bats, lanterns and characters with an S on his chest. A character begins to be special if it is as unique as possible. Which engages with the following: Non
kill. Point. Why kill if you then go back to life? If on top, when you kill him then you put the uniform sidekick turn to, to raise the dead, having two characters with the same name or three! Especially if everyone knows what will happen in the end and will take the replacement until the original return. They only worked with Wally West and even that has spoiled.
Create scenarios. DC events beyond special crossovers remain as such. They have consequences for the characters and, above all, the scenario where they move. If you want to create Universe events must affect not only the characters, but the environment around them. You may tell their own stories and nestled in a common scenario called DC Universe even find inspiration for new and better stories. At the end of the essence of storytelling is the characters face unexpected difficulties. Distrust of the authors who are always complaining how well it was what they were prepared and how bad it was for the "editorial interference." Any ideas
more, my dears? Ms. Nelson is reading, really, and takes note. So, eh.
dealing with authors. Carlos Pacheco Hire or Kubert and pass almost unnoticed is of infinite stupidity and total. Change on the fly the conditions of contracts Vertigo line and making escape to Garth Ennis and Warren Ellis to IDW is to let them look. It is true that DC has a good stable of cartoonists, with Amanda Conner and Frank Quitely which attract me most, not to mention Ivan Reis and Gary Frank. However, as quality writers only have to Johns and Morrison on alternate days and Straczinsky is thinking about his films in his comics.
Looking to the future. Stop writing stories that fix problems created by other stories. Do not be slaves to continuity. Knowing that continuity is a tool, not an end. In DC would have to make motivational posters with phrases like the above, to see if they get into your head.
Clean
dramatis personae. In DC there are too many sprinters, archers, bats, lanterns and characters with an S on his chest. A character begins to be special if it is as unique as possible. Which engages with the following: Non
kill. Point. Why kill if you then go back to life? If on top, when you kill him then you put the uniform sidekick turn to, to raise the dead, having two characters with the same name or three! Especially if everyone knows what will happen in the end and will take the replacement until the original return. They only worked with Wally West and even that has spoiled.
Create scenarios. DC events beyond special crossovers remain as such. They have consequences for the characters and, above all, the scenario where they move. If you want to create Universe events must affect not only the characters, but the environment around them. You may tell their own stories and nestled in a common scenario called DC Universe even find inspiration for new and better stories. At the end of the essence of storytelling is the characters face unexpected difficulties. Distrust of the authors who are always complaining how well it was what they were prepared and how bad it was for the "editorial interference." Any ideas
more, my dears? Ms. Nelson is reading, really, and takes note. So, eh.